Done. no guesses.

Done

TallMike why do you care if the science is settled or not?

@TallMike that is not a rebuttal but part of a scientific debate. As you can see in the table that is printed in the original article, the current knowledge for the ECS ranges from 0.6 to 3 degrees, so that this new estinate which she herself calles crude is in the range of the other estaimates. The problem is that there is not enough data to give a proper estimate and it is a theoretical constant anyway that does not tell what happens now. Todays warming had been arounf 1 without doubling of CO2 - so to reach an equilibrium of only 0.6 after doubling of only 0.6 needs some strong downwards forcing which we do noy know about.

Anyway, I do not beleive that a nearal net with data from 900-1800 can predict the coming centuries (which is what the article claims). It also claims to use state-of-the-art big data methods, but in fact it uses an old 1991 neural net method which is "ancient" technology.

Slow. 16.

Done

start

ding

yesterdays expert knocked off